<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Charlotte as Currer and Collette as Colin: Why Women Used Male Pseudonyms in the Victorian Era</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.loveromancepassion.com/charlotte-as-currer-and-collette-as-colin-why-women-used-male-pseudonyms-in-the-victorian-era/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.loveromancepassion.com/charlotte-as-currer-and-collette-as-colin-why-women-used-male-pseudonyms-in-the-victorian-era/</link>
	<description>Because Books Don&#039;t Fall Asleep Afterwards!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:26:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karin</title>
		<link>http://www.loveromancepassion.com/charlotte-as-currer-and-collette-as-colin-why-women-used-male-pseudonyms-in-the-victorian-era/#comment-7937</link>
		<dc:creator>Karin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 19:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loveromancepassion.com/?p=7780#comment-7937</guid>
		<description>I have my doubts too.  But very good points!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have my doubts too.  But very good points!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda Banche</title>
		<link>http://www.loveromancepassion.com/charlotte-as-currer-and-collette-as-colin-why-women-used-male-pseudonyms-in-the-victorian-era/#comment-7929</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda Banche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 12:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loveromancepassion.com/?p=7780#comment-7929</guid>
		<description>Hi Donna. I just bought my copy of LOVE AND SCANDAL, and I&#039;m sure I&#039;m going to have a great time with it!

As for women in a man&#039;s world, those attitudes still exist. I work in a so-called &quot;man&#039;s&quot; job, and I see them every day. They&#039;re not as blatant as they were in Collette&#039;s time, or even 20 years ago, but they&#039;re still there. Will they every go away? After all my years in the workplace, I have my doubts.

I can understand Collette&#039;s dilemma. She wants to write, not take on the world. You can do only so much before you&#039;re exhausted. Jane Austen didn&#039;t really have a choice but to hide behind the &quot;By A Lady&quot; with which she signed her books. By Collette&#039;s times, things were opening up, but they were still a big struggle. Even today, when women are acknowledged as authors, there&#039;s still a stigma attached to writing romance--and I think it&#039;s because romance is mainly written by women for women. You don&#039;t see the same attitude about westerns or war stories--could it be because they&#039;re mainly written by men for men?

Hope you have lots of sales!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Donna. I just bought my copy of LOVE AND SCANDAL, and I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;m going to have a great time with it!</p>
<p>As for women in a man&#8217;s world, those attitudes still exist. I work in a so-called &#8220;man&#8217;s&#8221; job, and I see them every day. They&#8217;re not as blatant as they were in Collette&#8217;s time, or even 20 years ago, but they&#8217;re still there. Will they every go away? After all my years in the workplace, I have my doubts.</p>
<p>I can understand Collette&#8217;s dilemma. She wants to write, not take on the world. You can do only so much before you&#8217;re exhausted. Jane Austen didn&#8217;t really have a choice but to hide behind the &#8220;By A Lady&#8221; with which she signed her books. By Collette&#8217;s times, things were opening up, but they were still a big struggle. Even today, when women are acknowledged as authors, there&#8217;s still a stigma attached to writing romance&#8211;and I think it&#8217;s because romance is mainly written by women for women. You don&#8217;t see the same attitude about westerns or war stories&#8211;could it be because they&#8217;re mainly written by men for men?</p>
<p>Hope you have lots of sales!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

