<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: Friday&#8217;s Child by Georgette Heyer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.loveromancepassion.com/review-fridays-child-by-georgette-heyer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.loveromancepassion.com/review-fridays-child-by-georgette-heyer/</link>
	<description>Romance Novel Reviews by Readers for Readers! We love Trashy Books, Bodice-Rippers, and Erotica.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:37:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Keira</title>
		<link>http://www.loveromancepassion.com/review-fridays-child-by-georgette-heyer/comment-page-1/#comment-636</link>
		<dc:creator>Keira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loveromancepassion.com/?p=88#comment-636</guid>
		<description>Which would fit the author&#039;s time period, but not perhaps the British Regency era... 1811 to 1820.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which would fit the author&#8217;s time period, but not perhaps the British Regency era&#8230; 1811 to 1820.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mailani</title>
		<link>http://www.loveromancepassion.com/review-fridays-child-by-georgette-heyer/comment-page-1/#comment-635</link>
		<dc:creator>Mailani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loveromancepassion.com/?p=88#comment-635</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s another interesting opinion on it:  http://www.phrases.org.uk/bulletin_board/6/messages/1133.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s another interesting opinion on it:  <a href="http://www.phrases.org.uk/bulletin_board/6/messages/1133.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.phrases.org.uk/bulletin_board/6/messages/1133.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mailani</title>
		<link>http://www.loveromancepassion.com/review-fridays-child-by-georgette-heyer/comment-page-1/#comment-634</link>
		<dc:creator>Mailani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loveromancepassion.com/?p=88#comment-634</guid>
		<description>http://www.bartleby.com/81/16611.html

Looks like the 1900s</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.bartleby.com/81/16611.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.bartleby.com/81/16611.html</a></p>
<p>Looks like the 1900s</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mailani</title>
		<link>http://www.loveromancepassion.com/review-fridays-child-by-georgette-heyer/comment-page-1/#comment-633</link>
		<dc:creator>Mailani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loveromancepassion.com/?p=88#comment-633</guid>
		<description>Um... I don&#039;t know I thought &#039;Tom, Dick, and Harry&#039; was a term used in the early 40s, but I&#039;m just guessing- the closes link to this phrase I could find was:  

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Dick_And_Harry#cite_ref-0

It&#039;s interesting though, how phrases and cliches get started.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um&#8230; I don&#8217;t know I thought &#8216;Tom, Dick, and Harry&#8217; was a term used in the early 40s, but I&#8217;m just guessing- the closes link to this phrase I could find was:  </p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Dick_And_Harry#cite_ref-0" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Dick_And_Harry#cite_ref-0</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s interesting though, how phrases and cliches get started.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
