Get into Bed with Rhonda Leigh Jones (Author Interview)

authorinterview

Today's intimate interview is with Rhonda Leigh Jones, the author of Maestro's Butterfly, which was reviewed the other day. I'm excited to share her with you today as we're going to be discussing audio books, epublishing, her books, writing and more!

Q: I have just finished listening to Maestro's Butterfly on audio and it was wonderful. What was your inspiration for the book?

A: First of all, thank you for listening, and for having such kind things to say. For me, characters usually come before story, and so I was aware of Claudio for some time before I began to write MB. I didn't know his name at first; I just had a face and the hint of personality. That actually came from a minor character in a movie I'd watched.

Q: Have you had the chance to hear your audio book? How did you feel hearing your writing the first time?

A: It was both thrilling and painful! Thrilling because Rebecca did such a wonderful job. I really wasn't expecting French accents and the whole nine yards, and so it was a great pleasure to hear someone "act" my story. But hearing her say some of the things I'd written made me blush terribly. I kept putting my hands over my ears and saying, "No, turn it off; turn it off!" And then, "Turn it back on!" I can't believe I write these things, lol.

Q: What do you think of your narrator and the voices? Did she give you chills? My favorite voice was that of Claudio. Shiver. Grin.

A: Yes, it's pretty amazing that, on one level, you hear this woman reading the part, and on another level, you hear his voice, at the same time. I think she did a great job with Claudio. He was so much fun to write. If I have a character that could be considered my "Lestat," meaning that I love him as much as Anne Rice obviously loved Lestat, then that would be Claudio. He's such a beast, lol. There is an interview with him on my blog by the way, and another with Chloe.

Q: Do you think readers get more out of the audio version than they do in the print?

A: I think it depends on the reader. And I think it's hard for the writer to say, because I'm so close to the material. I personally get a lot out of the audio version because I've been looking at this book in print for years, and I'm fairly sick of seeing the words. But when it comes to me in a different format, it's like experiencing the story for the first time. For the first time, I can really step back and see - or hear, rather - what I did. I'm very glad there is an audio version because I know that there are plenty of people who would rather experience books that way. And who knows? Maybe some readers will like the story so much they have to experience it both ways.

Q: Do you prefer listening to or reading erotica?

A: I would rather read it because, honestly, I tend to skip a lot. I'm a very tough customer, and easily bored. Especially when it comes to sex, because my buttons are hard to reach. And I'm a very visual person. And if I'm terribly interested in a story, I'll devour it quickly, which you can't do with audio.

Q: Can you share a bit about Maestro's Apprentice and Maestro's Maker? What order should your books be read or does it matter?

A: Maker is the second in the series, but it's actually the prequel. It's the story of how Claudio became a vampire, and it's set at the beginning of the French Revolution. "Claudio" is actually an Italian name, so we see how he got that. If you look beyond Claudio's arrogance and his frightening qualities, you'll see that he really is a very loyal man who is very concerned with family. Maker goes into that, and also reveals some of the reasons why that is true. And there is another person in the book that Butterfly readers will know. Apprentice takes place right after Butterfly, and focuses more on Adam, although it's really more about one of the feeders. All of these books are really about how Claudio affected other people. So, though he's the series main character, the books have their own main characters-the women he has affected.

Q: Of the three works, which is your personal favorite and why?

A: Easy! Maestro's Butterfly, because it was the first. It was the work that really taught me how to write a novel. I suffered terribly while writing it because I wasn't sure at first what the story was, but Claudio's presence was so strong I couldn't stop tinkering with it. It was a very romantic time of my life. I spent many late nights working for my vampire muse. And it led to my meeting one of my best friends, who is also a writer with a sexy vampire. We would both be up working late, and so ended up emailing and supporting each other quite a lot.

Q: I sort of have this mental picture of Claudio in my head and you mentioned earlier that he was inspired by a minor character... so dish if he were played in a movie by an actor, who would it be?

stephen-rea

A: LOL! Stephen Rea, because he looks like Rea's Santiago in Interview With the Vampire. Except that was 20 years ago, so Rea is a bit older now, so we'd have to get someone younger. But Victoire would definitely have to be played by Adrien Brody, lol.

adrienbrody

Q: Tell us a little about your experience with Ravenous Romance and epublishing. How are you finding the whole affair?

A: That would be so much easier to answer if I had something to compare it to! They've been very good about keeping in touch and troubleshooting things and listening to me. I know that friends who are published by traditional publishers have communication issues that I don't have. And if a mistake is made, it's very easy for Ravenous to fix it. They seem very enthusiastic about what they're doing. In addition, I think they're on the cutting edge, because the industry is changing, thanks to the alternatives that technology gives us and the shifting economy. I really like the idea of epublishing for various reasons. It's greener. It's convenient. You can have so many more books this way. So I've been happy with the experience. And I think the name is perfect, since my first series happens to be about vampires!

Q: What do you think makes a great [written] bedroom scene?

A: I'm glad you asked me this, because almost everybody does it wrong. A great sex scene is all about the conversation. It isn't enough to tell readers who is doing what to whom. Let's face it: Sex is basically "insert Tab A into Slot B." The rest is foreplay and there are only so many variations. Once you see where a scene is going, physically, you don't need to read the rest. However, if the scene is about how and why this or that is done, then you have a conversation. If you stress the conversation, then you have as many unique scenes as you want to write. The conversation of sex is going to be different at different times, even with the same couple. The actions should show mood, power structure, and whatever else is going on in the person's mind.

For instance, think about blow jobs and power. If the dominant male demands that his submissive female give him a blow job and she complies happily, that is one story. But what if she is angry with him? That should come out in the scene. What if it is a dominant female giving her submissive male a blow job? What if she is angry with him? See how many different scenes you have? And all with the same act. Nuance is everything.

Q: Got any pet peeves when it comes to romance or writing?

A: I hate HEAs. I do. I like a certain realism in writing and I don't want things tied up neatly at the end. It seems silly to me. So I write Happy For Nows. I like to have the suggestion of motion present, even at the very end. I prefer grit and darkness, which is why I write about things like punishment. Real corporal punishment is something you will see in every erotica story I ever write. As far as writing in general goes, I don't like it when authors get so happy about what they can do with words that they forget to tell a good story. If you must sacrifice prose or story, sacrifice prose.

Q: Is there anything else you'd like to share with us?

A: I can't think of anything at the moment, but something may come later.

Thanks again. :D

Rj

It was a pleasure to talk with you Rhonda! Be sure to check out Rhonda's blog at http://rhondaleigherotica.blogspot.com.

You can buy the audio version of Maestro's Butterfly here.

Originally posted 2009-03-16 05:20:18. Republished by Blog Post Promoter

Online Stores

Ebook Publishers and Erotica Romance

dearauthorSo today Jane from Dear Author came out and reviewed Knight Moves by Jamaica Layne. I have not had a chance to read the ebook yet, but I am understandingly sympathetic to the squicks being brought up. Clearly the novel is not going to be accepted or beloved by a majority of readers due to language choice and certain erm... acts.

The comments to Jane's posts are more enlightening as posters argue the merits of erotica, compare the language to other authors, and defend Layne from Jane's biased review. I'm about halfway through the comments and so far nobody has stood up for the book itself - which to me would make more sense for the hostility against Jane (by some commenters) because then she would be commenting negatively on somebody's personal choice of material to get off with.

As evidence by their about section Ravenous Romance strives to provide high-quality, sensual romance. They are looking to bring solid authors and stories to the table that turn you on and leave you emotionally satisfied at the end. Did Knight Moves do that? It doesn't look like it...

Of course what turns one person on is completely different from the next and can be seen as offensive and crass. I found Anne Rice's Sleeping Beauty Novels to be a complete turn off and they are well received if you give weight to the 4 Stars average from Amazon's 160 reviewers.

Written erotica is a tough nut to crack. It needs to be evocative and stirring. It needs take the romance novel deeper into the bedroom (or wherever!) and shed the euphemisms and pussyfooting without crossing the line.

Perhaps Ravenous Romance should consider following Samhain Publishing with warnings on their stories:

Warning, this title contains the following: explicit sex, graphic language, D/s, light bondage, menage a trois, hot nekkid man-love.

What do you think? Does that sound like a good solution? It won't help with awful writing but it will help appraise readers of what they are getting themselves into before they commit to a purchase.

It's not all bad news though, epublishing and erotica are gaining momentum and recognition. Ravenous Romance's Holly Schmidt was interviewed at MobilizedTV. I particularly liked this portion:

Is there something about the mobile platform that made a good fit for erotica aimed at women?

I think it’s portable and discreet. The fact the reader can be sitting on the train and reading a dirty story and nobody knows it has an appeal.

ETA: Okay I'm all caught up with the comments from Jane's recent post and while Knight Moves is the primary focus, a couple of readers have come forward and pointed out other RR stories that are good including: Haunted Seduction by Morgan James, The Toast Bitches by Sandra Cormier, and Sex, Lies and Wedding Bells. Like with print publishers, epublishers will have good reads and bad reads. It's not fair to judge all by one book.

You can get double your money with Ravenous Romance now by buying gift certifications in denominations of $25. They are calling it their stimulus package.

Also in Epublishing news B&N Buys Fictionwise for 15.7 Million Dollars.

Online Stores

The Romance Novel – Women’s Porn? Take Two:

romancenookI was reading Not Everything Erotic is Romantic over at All About Romance's Blog. It touched a bit on what I was thinking when I was writing The Romance Novel - Women's Porn? However Lynn said something I forgot to touch on in my original post, which I thought I would do now using an illustration from her musings. She said:

Lynn: ...it seems to be an extension of what I've seen some erotic romance publishers do in recent years. They throw books our way and say "You'll love it! It's a romance. We swear!" When readers respond with indifference to, say, books without a romance, publishers often wonder what's up with that. Why aren't we buying those books? After all, they have plenty of sex - and isn't the sex what romance readers are really looking for?

Wrong! The difference between a romance novel and porn is the focus on the emotions--the happily ever after. That's the good stuff. Right there is why women, or at least I, buy and buy into romance. The emotions make the sex worthwhile in a book. Sex between leads must serve a purpose. My comment in no way is meant to dismiss erotica. I find some erotica to be quite singularly excellent and others like Anne Rice's Sleeping Beauty Trilogy to be complete crap. It's as Carolyn Jewel says from the post Defined: Emotion and Passion, pt 1:

Carolyn Jewel: There must be something at risk, something changed between them [the leads] afterward. If your characters aren’t risking anything emotionally through their intimacy, then it’s just boring.  Every bedroom scene has to change the relationship between the characters. This can include making things seem even worse, by the way. Intimacy does not always equal happy ever after, especially early on in a relationship. It’s not only about who’s touching who where. The best bedroom scenes never, ever lose focus on the emotion, even when one of the characters thinks there isn’t any.

In many cases the difference between an okay romance and a great romance is the sexual tension. Without it the writing is lacking. Intimacy is created with sex; it is where you're vulnerable, where you learn about your partner, and most importantly learn a bit about yourself. In an author interview with erotica writer, Jamaica Layne I asked her to define a weakness in romance and she illustrated a weakness from tame romance, which I agreed with wholeheartedly. She said:

Jamaica: —–I think a major weakness of most “sweet” romance novels is the fact they leave the sex out.  One reason I’m so drawn to writing erotica is because it leaves the sex in without asking the reader to fill in their own details.  Don’t get me wrong—-I still like a good non-erotic romance novel—-but there still needs to be at least some sex and/or sensuality in order for it to appeal to me.  Even Jane Austen understood the importance of sex in romance—–all of her heroines are quite sensual, even though her books make no direct mention of sex.

I could watch and read Pride and Prejudice forever. The conclusion to draw from this is that sex in romance must be tied in with emotion, attraction, and create a dynamic pull between the characters and the reader. We must feel the same drive the characters do. When sex is written and it serves no purpose to the reader or the characters, it's like trying to pull teeth, excruciating, or kissing a cold fish, plainly displeasing and alienating. Nothing can pull a reader out of a story quicker than a poorly written sex scene that's clumsy or unnecessary. Authors can include sex or not but never ever should they write a romance without these three elements; because the tension, attraction and emotional vulnerability are all essential to creating a romance that readers want to read and reread time and again.

Photo Credit's: 1

Online Stores

Free Email Updates