Comments on: Top Ten Reasons Not to Travel Back in Time to 1814

By: Laurie Brown

Laurie Brown — Wed, 29 Apr 2009 23:45:21 +0000

Hi,
Thanks for posting comments.

I agree Susan. I didn’t even think about perscriptions. Maybe I’ll use that in the next book.

Lusty: Thanks for the plug on my previous book. I hope you enjoyed it. Were you surprised at the ending? It’s especially hard to get to that HEA in a time travel. I work really hard on my endings because there’s nothing worse than reading a tt and loving it all the way through, and then hating the ending.

BG: Good luck with your book. I checked it out on Amazon because I’m always willing to give a hand to a fellow writer. But $30.00 is a little steep for my book budget. Sorry.

By: Lusty Reader

Lusty Reader — Wed, 29 Apr 2009 12:53:38 +0000

Even WITH this list of horrors I still fantasize about how exciting it would be to time travel to Jane Austen’s time, which is why books like Laurie Brown’s are so fun to read. I literally just read “Hundreds of Years to Reform a Rake” yesterday so I had to comment on this post!!!

By: Susan

Susan — Wed, 29 Apr 2009 12:16:06 +0000

Let’s see…main reasons for not going back in time.
#1 No vanilla bean frappucino’s from Starbuck’s
#2 No generic version of Imitrex for migraines (my nausea would be mistaken for morning sickness & I’d be shamed out of town) LOL
#3 No Kindle 2 to read e-books (Need I say more?)
It might be worthwile if Lord Shermont had a nice accent:)